Sunday, January 29, 2017

Dig Deeper into the Mainstays (u02a2)

When I was looking into this blog post assignment, I was excited to see there were a few websites in the 3 categories that I had not had the opportunity to use or haven't used in a very long time. Finding time to look through new tools is hard, but important.

Social - Edmodo
From the first category, Social, I already widely use Twitter for my own PLN but not for student learning. Since I teach K-5 students, I don't feel Facebook is an appropriate route to take since you must be 13 or older to use Facebook. Eight years ago I utilized Edmodo in my middle school language arts class, but I haven't since. This is a good opportunity for me to re-evaluate Edmodo, see what is new, and determine if it would be beneficial to my students.

The first thing that jumps out at me when on Edmodo is how much it looks and feels like Facebook. This is a positive thing, I believe, because social media is prominent in the lives of my upper elementary students, thus giving them a feeling they are using a social media website. Everything being in one place is of importance as well. I can easily post an assignment, quiz, or a note right from the first screen. This also pops up in chronological order on student's accounts, which helps them stay organized. When assigning, I can also attach a link, file, or bring something up from my Library of items. Having these options are great because it gives me various options for assignments. Another great aspect of Edmodo is the creation of groups. I can assign different work to different groups and groups can converse with each other on the platform without others interfering.

While I was researching how other teachers engage students with Edmodo, I came across an idea from Jennifer Lewis, a high school teacher. She pointed out that with Edmodo, you can add apps to your student's accounts. For example, students can access Office365 or NoRedInk app without ever having to log into another account. This is a great way to app smash without students having to remember various account information or website/app names. Another great idea Jennifer Lewis had was to use Edmodo for literature circle groups. Though I don't teach lit circles anymore since my role is now technology integrationist, I could see how Edmodo would be a terrific platform for sharing lit circle information related to student roles.

In general, the social category can enhance student learning because it can be utilized as a way for students to share information, ideas, and check each other's progress. Having work posted on a social platform is a great way to initiate collaboration between team members and have a place to post work for others to view and comment. Online etiquette and online safety can be part of the learning taking place when on social websites.

Creative - WeVideo
Since I already have experience with VoiceThread and Prezi, I evaluated WeVideo. Though I've watched videos that have been posted on WeVideo, I've never had the chance to dive into all that WeVideo is capable of until today. When reading the first page on the login screen, I noticed all videos are housed online in the cloud. This immediately got me thinking about how wonderful it will be not to have to worry about which computer a project is saved on. What also stood out to me is that WeVideo can be used on my iPad as well, giving me more options for video recording then just using a video camera.

Unfortunately I found two downfalls right away. The first being I had to really dig to find a place to sign up for a free account. With how robust the editing software is, I can see how beneficial it would be to have a paid account, however, I just wanted to test-drive the site. The second downfalls was in the user agreement. I found that WeVideo is intended for students over the age of 13, at least in the free version. If I wanted to use a paid version specifically for school, I would have to see if the user agreement is different for those accounts.

Like many editing software available, it has drag and drop that allows the user to move around various pieces. I also like how the menus at the top use pictures instead of words, this is helpful for my low readers or ELL students. Being able to video record straight from the web browser aids in cutting down confusion from having to go from a website to the desktop. Lastly, even though there are various options for enhancing a video, such as transitions and music, it does not cause the user to get "lost" in that is available. For instance, there are a limited number of transitions and themes, allowing the student to have creativity without loosing the goal of the project.

The creative category can really enhance and engage students in the learning process. When utilizing any creative software, students are in the trenches of learning because they are put in the driver seat instead of the teacher. Students are the ones coming up with ideas of how to showcase their learning and understanding. The depth of knowledge can also be deeper because of having to apply their knowledge and synthesize it into their project.

As I was researching how teachers use WeVideo in the classroom, it seemed many were using it as a way to explain a process. One example that I found interesting included students explaining how to perform a skill in gym class. The gymnasium can be one place where it is hard to incorporate technology into student learning, but this is a great example of doing just that. I do believe students will remember the skill as well as be able to apply the skill after creating their video. Also, other students may learn better from a peer then from an adult.

Curation - BlendSpace
Since I already extensively use Symbaloo for school and Pintrest for personal use,I decided to try out Blendspace instead. I've already created content in EduClipper for another class. Though I've not yet used Blendspace in my own classroom, I just researched and presented about Blendspace for a technology conference and thus I'm applying what I learned to this blog post.

One of the fantastic features of Blendspace is that it is all drag and drop. For my younger students, there is no worrying about copy and pasting. The second great feature is that all that you need to build your Blendspace is found right beside the work space. If a student wants to add a video, quiz, or information, you can search sources such as Google, YouTube, Google Drive, and the computer straight from the same space where the item will be dropped. There is no flip-floping between screens, websites, or devices. Students will have less of a chance getting lost in the creation process. 

Unlike some of the other curation sites, you can create a quiz in Blendspace, instead of needing another website, copying the link, and pasting it in. Also, unlike other curation websites, all of the content is house within Blendspace. So, instead of clicking on a link and it opening another browser or tab, all the content stays on the Blendspace website. I can also shuffle through each resource by using an arrow instead of needing to go back to the original work space. Lastly, there are 198 ways to share one's work on Blendspace, making it easier for students to compile a digital profile.

Curation websites in general are exceptional at providing a place to put work. For example, Blendspace provides a place for a user to place their information during research. It does little to offer any creativity with the content, but does provide a great starting point for finding out more information about a particular topic. Curation websites can also give students a place to collaborate on projects, especially if all students are researching at the same time. When utilizing a curation website, a teacher could easily tie in how to find reputable websites and how to analyze information before using it.

Friday, January 27, 2017

Using New Technologies u02a1

I interviewed another teacher, Sandy, who lives in a different area of Iowa. I choose this teacher because she not only has years of experience in the classroom, but is constantly integrating web 2.0 technology tools. When on the phone, she decided to discuss the website www.storybird.com with me. Coincidentally, this is a tool we both utilize in our classrooms.

Recommendations from other teachers is one starting place for Sandy when looking for a tool to use in her Gift and Talented and/or English as a Second Language students. Sandy stated that when she chooses a web 2.0 tool, the first thing she does is filter it through the Iowa Core. She determines if it aligns with the standards for the grade in which she is working with. If it does, then she bases her decision on student interest as well as ease of use for educators.

Fortunately for Sandy, she does not typically need special permission from administration to implement new tools. Using her own good judgement and checking the user agreements for age of use is how she avoids obstacles with technology tools. For example, Storybird is geared towards educators and students, the user agreements allows for children 13 and under to operate it, and she tested the website before presenting it to her class.

Sandy has a few pieces of advice for other teachers looking to incorporate Storybird into their projects. Focusing on the writing or editing process is the best use of Storybird. The explicit instruction model works extremely well when introducing this tool to upper elementary or middle school students. For example, first, Sandy shows the class how to operate the website in a whole-class setting. Then, together, the class makes a trial story together employing the information they learned from the previous step. Together, students walk through each step of the story making process on the website. Now, students have the ability and confidence to create their own story on their own. During the last phase of explicit teaching, Sandy explains how her students can self and peer edit their pieces of work. 

One last piece of advice Sandy gives is Storybird is a great tool for differentiating instruction because students have the ability to work at their own level. Each student has a differing writing ability and can be fairly graded on their individual abilities when employing this web 2.0 tool. Teachers can easily scaffold each student at their level. For example, when writing a story, some students are able to include a beginning, middle and end, while others have mastered this skill and can move on to including dialogue. Here are a few examples of Sandy's student's work.


I agree wholeheartedly in all that Sandy stated. I find it extremely important to check the user agreements before implementing any new tool. The safety and security of my students is a top priority. I also recognize testing the tool for alignment with standards is also important. It is good to have students using technology tools, but there should always be a purpose. One additional way I determine the validity of a tool is thinking about where it falls on the SAMR scale. If I am going to use a tool with my students, I want to ensure I'm using it with the goals for my students and an end in mind.

Friday, January 20, 2017

Creative Commons

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

I created a license for my blog and chose the Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike (by-nc-sa) license. Per the website wiki.creativecommons.org, this license allows others to download my material, make changes, but also give me credit. In addition, users cannot use my information for commercial purposes. I chose this license because I understand the importance of allowing others to build off people's ideas. If we don't allow others to access our ideas and suggestions, it is hard to make creative growth. When I started teaching, there was very little on the internet regarding awesome lessons and project ideas. I typically had to buy a book that provided me with new ideas. Today, we have access to a tremendous amount of ideas because teachers are willing to share. Twitter is a wonderful example, I have a constant stream of new ideas and thoughts coming my way every day. If I'm struggling, I can post a question and in minutes have suggestions or answers. This license aids me in continuing this process.

However, though I believe it is important for others to take my ideas and thoughts and use them in positive ways, I do not want others making money from it in a commercial sense. There is a lot to be said about the free flow of ideas and for others to make money off what other people think, I believe, would start to cripple the great sense of sharing that our country has right now.


Licensing Portal for Educators. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2017, from https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Licensing_Portal_for_Educators